<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Advice (new threads)</title>
		<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/c-88463/advice</link>
		<description>Threads in the forum category &quot;Advice&quot; - Share your advice, tips, and experiences on the job market</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 09:47:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2249525</guid>
				<title>Publication affiliation?</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2249525/publication-affiliation</link>
				<description>Second 9-month Lecturer contract at an elite SLAC - should I publish with them as my institutional affiliation?</description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>BDR PhD</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2747693</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Here's an interesting question:</p> <p>I struck out on the job market this year (boohoo, I certainly wasn't the only one), but I'm lucky enough to have been renewed for the second time as a 9-month Lecturer at an elite SLAC. As I continue to put out papers, I am wondering whether I should list this as my institutional affiliation? I do not technically &quot;do&quot; any research at the elite SLAC &#8212; most of my data come from MTurk, but I occasionally collect data from my students here. The other possibility would be to list my PhD-granting institution, where I am co-director of a lab, but have no other affiliation.</p> <p>Any thoughts? Potential downsides of listing this as my affiliation? Thanks!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2190221</guid>
				<title>Any suggestion? How to interpret this information?</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2190221/any-suggestion-how-to-interpret-this-information</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>hemo111</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>3033626</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I had a campus visit in an university last week in 21 March. In the interview, the chair of the committee said I should hear back from him in one week, but so far there is no news from him.</p> <p>But three days after the interview, I received an email from the chair professor (not the chair of the committee) saying that: &quot;The end result is we have two excellent candidates, but we’re just not sure whether we have one or two positions (was originally the former, but now some possibility it could be the latter). Hopefully this will be resolved soon and you’ll hear the outcome from the XXX(the chair of the committee). What does this mean? Do it mean they are requesting a second position to me? or they are just negotiating with the first ranked candidate?</p> <p>Thank you!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2175746</guid>
				<title>Follow up (again) or wait?</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2175746/follow-up-again-or-wait</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>lamare</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>3021961</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I had a 'preliminary' phone interview for a position and was told that they will be making decisions/invitations to campus within two weeks. Three weeks later, I contacted the chair to follow up and was told that there had been a delay on their part, but they should be moving forward within the next two weeks. It is now again in the third week since that last communication. Would it be ok to follow up again? Or would it appear 'impatient'/annoying? Thanks for any advice&#8230;.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2149246</guid>
				<title>Advice on navigating non-numeric start-up promises</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2149246/advice-on-navigating-non-numeric-start-up-promises</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 18:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>choices</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2778544</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi all. I was hoping to get some targeted advice on dealing with an offer/acceptance I just had/made (yay!). I will be starting next fall on a small, rural liberal arts school. The salary is on the lower-end of what I've seen, but I was able to negotiate a small increase to the middle of their starting asst range. The moving expenses coverage isn't great, but it's not too far from where we are currently at, so I'm not going to split hairs.</p> <p>My advice-seeking is related to when I brought up start-up, associated with things like research, furniture, computing needs. Obviously, this school is a 4/4 load and that's what I'm signing up for. As far as research goes, I will be able to apply for grants this summer with payouts in Fall, so that's not terrible. However, I'm sort of fixated on the dismissal of my other needs: getting the office set-up that I will feel most comfortable with. I'm a youngin' who has grown-up with technology&#8212;I consider myself a person with specific needs. Not terribly expensive needs, just particular. Also, if I am going to be spending a lot of time in my office, I'd like it to be comfortable. I'd rather not sit in a 20+ yr old swivel chair that's lost all cushion and barely swivels. The provost/dean said I would need to work with the division chair for specific requests, first to see if the college has it already, and if not, what would be the cost. That sounds fine. What worries me is that I'll ask for something and I'll get a no, because this wasn't a negotiated/in-writing thing I requested.</p> <p>So I guess my question is: how do make sure I feel comfortable, both physically and psychologically, if some of my concerns get pushed under the rug or not addressed to my satisfaction? I get that I might be focusing on the wrong thing, but there is something to it I think, I dunno. A long-time faculty member I met on my campus visit completely remodeled his office and it looks fantastic, but I didn't get the information as to who paid for such a remodel.</p> <p>Side note: I met the division chair for a total of 5 secs on my visit because of his class schedule. Didn't get to ask him anything I know now to be his purview. Should I wait until I get the contract paperwork to reach out to him?</p> <p>Thanks for listening to my droning. Any perspective or thoughts are appreciated!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2137795</guid>
				<title>Tiny school questions</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2137795/tiny-school-questions</link>
				<description>How to evaluate workload?</description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>tinyQuestions</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2991049</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I've been looking at jobs at some of the really small liberal arts colleges (e.g., under 1000 students), and I think there's a lot to love about them. But one last thing I'm not sure how to evaluate is the teaching load.</p> <p>I assume that a 4-4 teaching load at a school where the mean class size is 20 is pretty different from a 4-4 at a school where the mean class size is 100. Is this true? Can anyone speak to this?</p> <p>And what does this mean for faculty workload: Is a 4-4 at a very small school going to be an insane workload or a reasonable one?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2127843</guid>
				<title>Should I email the SC chair after phone interview to ask about campus interview?</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2127843/should-i-email-the-sc-chair-after-phone-interview-to-ask-abo</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>jobs2016</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2240688</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I had a campus interview with School A last week and a phone interview with School B the week before that. School A is conducting campus interviews this week with other candidates and they said they will make a decision shortly after the last candidate's interview (tomorrow). So if I am their first choice I should be hearing back some time next week. But my phone interview with School B went well and I would really like to have a campus interview there. I told them about my campus interview with School A (without revealing the name) and the chair said &quot;please make sure to let us know if there are any developments.&quot; I am not exactly sure about School B's phone interview timeline; it sounded like they should be done last week. My first question is, should I contact School B and ask whether they are going to invite me to campus, even though I don't have an offer or anything from the other school? It's been 12 days since my phone interview with School B, but I've also heard that getting an approval for campus interviews takes time sometimes. My second question is, if I get an offer from School A, how much time will I have to make a decision? I'm sure it varies from school to school but I was just wondering what others have experienced.<br /> Thank you very much in advance. I'm glad this forum exists.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2122591</guid>
				<title>Initial contact re: offer vs. Another in-person interview</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2122591/initial-contact-re:offer-vs-another-in-person-interview</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Iliketomoveitmoveit</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2758719</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Unique situation:</p> <p>I'm an advanced Assistant at an R1, but the University is really more of an R2 and Psychology/my scholarship is not valued by the upper administration. At all.</p> <p>-Department Chair of University 1 has made initial contact regarding a phone call to discuss an offer (went on in-person interview already). No verbal or official offer yet. This place is a land-grant tier 1 state institution and the University and Departmental situation would be a huge improvement over my current place. But, it is in a state that has mimicked Trump's federal hiring freeze by instituting a state-level hiring freeze. A little nervous about the offer, and this would most likely be another advanced Assistant position.</p> <p>-Search Chair of University 2 requesting an in-person interview. This place has a good Department and would be a good location but institution not on the same level of first place. If I had offers from both places I would probably lean towards first place. However, this could be Associate level.</p> <p>Should I accept offer of an in-person interview at place 2? Should I not say anything about place 1, or use it as leverage to move up timeline/negotiate Associate status?</p> <p>I agree that it's a dick move to take interview slots from potential candidates when you have an offer, but the offer at place 1 is in the infancy stage and could get pulled. Place 2 would be a great option if place 1 didn't work out.</p> <p>Please share your thoughts, this is a very timely decision and family considerations are highly relevant.</p> <p>Thanks!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2117908</guid>
				<title>Breaking the news?</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2117908/breaking-the-news</link>
				<description>How do you tell them you are leaving?</description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 21:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Guest3897897</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2978417</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi,<br /> I am leaving my current position for a better offer in a much better location.<br /> What is the best way to break the news to colleagues/faculty?<br /> Do you start with the Dean and then move down? Or should I start with my<br /> psych department colleagues first and then move up?<br /> Are individual in-person meetings better than a group email?</p> <p>Thanks</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2073154</guid>
				<title>choosing between multiple offers</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2073154/choosing-between-multiple-offers</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>soulsearching</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2960298</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I am in the fortunate position of having multiple tenure-track offers, each of which have different and important pros/cons (for instance different start-up, salary, teaching load, desirability of location, prestige of department, proximity to family, etc). Of course, I am negotiating to put the positions on as much of a level playing field as possible, and trying to make the decision quickly. While I realize the decision-making process is unique for each individual, can folks share what factors they have (or would have) considered and weighed most heavily when making this type of decision and why.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2058974</guid>
				<title>Interviewing in the British Isles</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2058974/interviewing-in-the-british-isles</link>
				<description>What to include in the 15-minute talk?</description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 23:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>usa5154</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2914460</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I'm an American and this is the first time I've interviewed outside the US (it's coming up later this month). Unlike interviews in the US which take place over multiple days and include multiple meals and individual meetings, as well as an hour-long talk, this entire campus visit is schedule for 50 minutes (a 15-minute talk, followed by a 5-minute Q&amp;A, followed by a 30-minute panel interview with me answering questions in front of the full search committee). I have heard that approaches like this are pretty common in the UK and Ireland, because they interview all of the candidates in one day. However, one thing that seems strange is that I was told my talk should be about the &quot;the contribution I will make to the Department of Psychology.&quot; The instructions said, &quot;candidates may cover research, teaching / programme delivery, administration.&quot; Notice that research, teaching, and &quot;administration&quot; are separated by commas, but words like &quot;and&quot; &amp; &quot;or&quot; are nowhere to be found. It's hard enough to condense a 45-minute job talk into 15 minutes, but am I also supposed to talk about my approach to teaching and administrative functions within that time? I was thinking that maybe I'd spend 13-14 minutes on research and then 1-2 minutes on teaching/service (it's a research-intensive university), but if anyone has any experience with this and can offer any guidance, I'd be very grateful.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2054717</guid>
				<title>Where to send CV updates</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2054717/where-to-send-cv-updates</link>
				<description>if no contact info is given?</description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2017 21:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>another_job_seeker</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2863498</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi all,</p> <p>When updating a SC about a new publication, what is the best thing to do when there is no contact person listed for questions about the job? I've checked the job ad, the confirmation e-mail I got when I applied, and the Department website. I've read in other threads to call the department secretary but I don't see contact information for one of those either. The &quot;Contact Us&quot; part of the Department's website lists the phone number and e-mail of the Department Chair. Should I just direct my e-mail to him?</p> <p>Any advice appreciated! I am worried that if I send it to the wrong place that person won't bother to get it where it needs to go.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2037357</guid>
				<title>too late to update search committee about paper?</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2037357/too-late-to-update-search-committee-about-paper</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>another_job_seeker</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2863498</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Hi all,</p> <p>I got back mid-week last week from an interview, and just today I had a first-author paper accepted in a good, but not mid-blowing journal. The search chair told me that they were meeting on 12/19 (yesterday) to discuss the outcome of the search, and that they'd let me know either before or after the holidays depending on how long it took to coordinate the recommendation with the dean's office, etc.</p> <p>Is there any point in updating them about this publication, given that they've probably already made their decision?</p> <p>Thanks!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2035562</guid>
				<title>interview after acceptance?</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2035562/interview-after-acceptance</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>PsychLife</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2420154</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I know this has been talked about here before and I sorta get it, but I still wonder if people have thoughts they might want to share. I currently have an offer from a school that wants me to make my decision relatively soon (i.e., before the new year). But I also have a handful of interviews scheduled for mid to late January. Why is it customary in academia to withdraw from searches after you accept a position? I can't imagine this is the case in other industries. I would think that if you accept a job with, say, Google for 6 months from now, and then Facebook comes along and asks you to come in for an interview, you wouldn't say no. So why do we do it? Why do we leave options on the table before exploring them? Why do the schools have this one-sided power? Is the negative repercussion simply that people at the school you accepted might hear you are going on interviews and be bummed and then that is a bad way to start if you end up going there after those other interviews? I totally get that this is the custom, but it has always kinda confused me.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2035395</guid>
				<title>Non-Traditional Spousal Accommodations</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2035395/non-traditional-spousal-accommodations</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>sardonic</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2798634</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Thanks all!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2034955</guid>
				<title>Turning down job offer: Phone or email?</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2034955/turning-down-job-offer:phone-or-email</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2016 00:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Psycher</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2880568</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I was wondering what is considered best etiquette&#8230; Turning down a job offer via phone or via email? Thoughts?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2034729</guid>
				<title>CV Question</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2034729/cv-question</link>
				<description>Keep book chapters and reviews separate or not?</description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 17:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>psychseeker15</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2926149</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I've seen variance on this when looking at other people's CVs. Are there any particular pros/cons to simply listing all publication together vs. keeping peer-reviewed articles separate from book chapters and review pieces? I have 6 peer-reviewed papers, 3 chapters/reviews, and one forthcoming chapter&#8230;if that helps determine whether to keep it all together vs. separate.</p> <p>Thanks!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2029150</guid>
				<title>Spousal hire</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2029150/spousal-hire</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>GS_2016</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2862503</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Good morning everyone.</p> <p>I am on the job market and was wondering about spousal hire. I read some of the previous posts on the topic but would like to get some updated info and ask more specific questions to my situation. My husband is also in graduate school but he is a year behind me with getting his PhD. He is also in psychology but in a different subfield than me.<br /> 1) when an offer comes, and spousal hire will be mentioned, is there a point in bringing other things like salary?<br /> 2) can the additional year until my husband gets his PHD be actually a good thing? Will allow the department and the school a year to figure out funding and such?</p> <p>Any other advise will be highly appreciated!</p> <p>Thank you!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2024271</guid>
				<title>timeline</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2024271/timeline</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 22:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>psydoc1111</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2865262</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>do search committee notify their top choice a week after last candidate?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2024080</guid>
				<title>Time between invite and interview?</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2024080/time-between-invite-and-interview</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 17:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>guestanon</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2916419</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>How much warning do schools typically provide between inviting candidates for the campus interview and actually conducting it? I'm new to this process and have had a couple of phone interviews. I want to carve out a good amount of time to make a job talk, and am trying to get a sense of whether I can wait until I get a campus invite (if I do), or if I should be starting now. I could always edit the talk later if I don't get invites this year, but I also have other things that I could spend my time on right now&#8230;</p> <p>Thanks!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2024029</guid>
				<title>No response to thank you notes?</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2024029/no-response-to-thank-you-notes</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>pksearch</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2916344</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I just had a campus visit, which went well. I sent out a thank you note to everyone I met, but didn't receive any responses at all, nothing. Is this unusual? Bad sign? Trying not to read into this too much&#8230;</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>