<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>CV Question</title>
		<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2034729/cv-question</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;CV Question&quot; - Keep book chapters and reviews separate or not?</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 18:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2034729#post-2712150</guid>
				<title>Re: CV Question</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2034729/cv-question#post-2712150</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 19:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>juniorfaculty</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2733720</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I'd separate them out. I'd only lump them together if you had a very small number of publications, but for your situation I'd separate them out.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2034729#post-2711196</guid>
				<title>Re: CV Question</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2034729/cv-question#post-2711196</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>DocJ</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1558250</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I've never seen a psych faculty CV where all publications are lumped together. They're not all equal. Peer-reviewed articles are most highly regarded. Book chapters vary, but are almost always not considered as strong as articles. Definitely separate these out.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2034729#post-2711183</guid>
				<title>CV Question</title>
				<link>http://psychjobsearch.wikidot.com/forum/t-2034729/cv-question#post-2711183</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 17:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>psychseeker15</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2926149</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I've seen variance on this when looking at other people's CVs. Are there any particular pros/cons to simply listing all publication together vs. keeping peer-reviewed articles separate from book chapters and review pieces? I have 6 peer-reviewed papers, 3 chapters/reviews, and one forthcoming chapter&#8230;if that helps determine whether to keep it all together vs. separate.</p> <p>Thanks!</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>